Portfolio Optimization III: Efficient Frontier based on Huang Litzenberger

In the second entry of this series, we mentioned the existence of an analytic method to calculate the efficient frontier of a portfolio. Here we provide the formulae for this method.

As for other methods to calculate the efficient frontier, this method requires knowledge of the variance-covariance matrix of the set of assets, as well as the expected return and standard deviation (volatility) of the asset returns.  The variance-covariance matrix is of course itself generally calculated from the standard deviations of the returns of individual assets and the correlation matrix between those returns.

Denoting the vector of expected returns by e, the variance-covariance matrix by V, and its inverse by VINV, and letting U denote the unit vector (consisting of ones, with the same dimension as the number of assets), then the vectors of weights (g and h, below) have returns of 0% and 100% respectively and the optimal portfolio is the vector g+rh, for any given desired level of return, r.

(For simplicity of presentation in the above formula, where the transposes of vectors are required for the matrix multiplication, these have not been shown.)

Since analytic formula allow the easy implementation of sensitivity analysis, we show in the chart below the position of the optimal curve when it is assumed that equity returns are lower than historic figures case and with higher volatilities (the raw data is not shown here, but the portfolio is assumed to consist of bills, bonds, and equities).

As stated earlier, the advantages of such analytic methods include their computational efficiency, and the ease with which sensitivity analysis can be conducted (for example, that associated with parameter uncertainty).  The main disadvantage is the inability to include constraints in the analysis.

In fact, there is a large set of real-life optimization problems for which analytic methods cannot readily be applied. Moreover, many problems in real-life cannot be adequately described from a risk-reward perspective in terms which involve only the expected return and standard deviation.  For this reason, tools such as Solver, and Palisade’s Evolver (for genetic algorithm optimization in Microsoft Excel) and RISKOptimizer (Monte Carlo software with genetic algorithm optimization) may need to be applied in a large set of real-life cases.

Dr. Michael Rees
Director of Training and Consulting

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: