Postgraduate Certificate in Risk Analysis in Health and Food Safety at the Royal Veterinary College of the University of London

Tuesday, February 5, 2013 by DMUU Training Team
  • What will be the effect of a new health policy in a country?
  • How do we quantify and mitigate health risks in our food supply?
  • Should we allow imports of a certain agricultural product?

Quantitative risk analysis techniques can help you answer these and many more questions. A new postgraduate certificate program in Risk Analysis in Health and Food Safety is being offered by EpiX Analytics and the Royal Veterinary College (RVC), University of London. “People interested in risk analysis in health and food safety come from a variety of backgrounds, so it was important for us to use software that is not only statistically sound, but also user friendly. This is why we chose @RISK as the primary teaching software for this course,” said Dr. Francisco Zagmutt, managing partner of EpiX Analytics and one of the course instructors.

This course will use many examples and case studies to provide participants with the skills for cutting-edge quantitative risk analysis in health and food safety. The course is designed to accommodate the work schedules of professionals from research institutions, governmental and international agencies; agricultural, food, pharmaceutical and related industry; and academic staff and post graduate students.

 » More information and to register
 » Case study about @RISK and the Royal Veterinary College
 » "Good Practices and Common Mistakes" webcast delivered by Dr. Huybert Groenendaal of EpiX Analytics

PricewaterhouseCoopers deals with uncertainty head on, using Corridor Budgeting

Monday, January 21, 2013 by DMUU Training Team

PricewaterhouseCoopers put together a beautiful video about the Corridor Budgeting program, developed by Tobias Flath and Michael Hofmann. Corridor Budgeting is a methodology combining planning, business management, and risk management in order to prepare for a range of possible outcomes, and thereby generate a more realistic picture of the future.

Palisade's DecisionTools Suite is an integral part of this program. As explained in the video: "We identify the factors underlying variables and ranges that impact on financial results. The Corridor is regularly analyzed and validated, giving visibility into any gaps or delta between target bandwidths and actual figures. Specially designed software then aggregates these bandwidths and event risks to paint an accurate picture of possible scenarios."

The video depicts modeling with Monte Carlo simulation: "A simulation models the total risk exposure. The width of the curve indicates the level of uncertainty. The height shows the likelihood that an event will occur, giving senior executives insights into the full spectrum of future possibilities, and making it easier to make the right decisions."

The video concludes, "Corridor Budgeting allows businesses to forecast more realistically, and prepare more effectively for what's to come, equipping them to face the future, however it turns out." It's a simple and beautiful explanation of how risk and decision analysis are a central part of business decisions today.

See PwC's Corridor Budgeting video here:

Free Webcast this Thursday: "Use of @RISK in Food Safety Risk Assessment" with Charles Yoe

Monday, January 7, 2013 by Dan Bruffey

Join us this Thursday, January 10, 2012, for a free live webcast entitled, "Use of @RISK in Food Safety Risk Assessment " to be presented by Charles Yoe.

The Food Safety Modernization Act is the most sweeping reform of FDA’s food safety authority in more than 70 years. It strengthens and increases the role of risk analysis in protecting consumers and promoting public health. In this free live webcast, Prof. Charles Yoe of Notre Dame of Maryland University will use the FDA/ Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition’s report “Quantitative Risk Assessment on the Public Health Impact of Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus In Raw Oysters” in a demonstration and discussion of the use of @RISK in food safety risk assessment.

Charles Yoe is a professor of economics at Notre Dame of Maryland University and an independent risk analysis consultant and trainer. Working extensively for U.S. and other government agencies as a consultant and risk analyst, his wide range of risk experience includes international trade, food safety, natural disasters, public works, homeland security, ecosystem restoration, resource development, navigation, planning, and water resources. As a consultant to private industry his work includes a discrete but wide variety of concerns. He has trained professionals from over 100 countries in risk analysis and has conducted customized risk training programs for government agencies and private industry in over two dozen nations.

» Register now (FREE)
» View archived webcasts

Fish Stock Levels being Threatened by Disease: @RISK gives aquatic farmers ability to test for disease cost effectively and implement key biosecurity measures

Friday, December 7, 2012 by DMUU Training Team

It’s estimated that the human population will be nine billion by 2030. The Food and Agriculture Organisation believes that aquaculture, which currently provides around half of the fish and shellfish eaten around the world, is the only agricultural industry with the potential to meet the protein requirements of this size of population.  

However, one of the biggest constraints to achieving this is the depletion of stock levels through disease. Biosecurity measures, which aim to prevent, control and ideally eradicate disease are regarded as essential. However, encouraging the adoption of these practices are often difficult due to aquatic farmers’ levels of education, training, responsibility and perceived economic benefits. In addition, global estimates of disease losses may appear remote and irrelevant to farmers and producers.

Having seen Palisade’s risk analysis tool @RISK being demonstrated, Dr Chris Walster, a qualified veterinary surgeon and the secretary of the World Aquatic Veterinary Medical Association (WAVMA), started using the program to calculate the realistic risk of aquatic disease to farms, with a focus on cases where data inputs were limited. The capacity of @RISK to present data in an easy to understand way meant farmers could more easily understand the disease risk probabilities, review the cost/benefit of disease prevention and make informed choices about whether to put controls in place.

“@RISK enables farmers to reduce the risk of disease spreading amongst their animals whilst minimising additional costs,” Dr Walster explains. “For aquatic vets, the key is the graphs which allow us to demonstrate a complex probability problem quickly and simply in a way that is easy to understand and trust. These inform decision-making, thereby helping to boost the world’s aquatic stock whilst safeguarding farmers’ livelihoods.”

“This technique also potentially offers an economical method of assisting in the control of many diseases. Farmers undertake their own tests, with each of these providing incremental inputs so that the macro picture can be developed and acted upon,” concludes Walster.

» Dr. Walster's PPT presentation:
   @RISK's Role in Biosecurity: Reducing Disease Risk when Data is Limited

» Case Study: Reducing the risk of disease in aquatic animals using @RISK from Palisade


 

Free Webcast this Thursday: “Good Practices and Common Mistakes”

Tuesday, December 4, 2012 by DMUU Training Team

Join us this Thursday, December 6, 2012, for a free live webcast entitled, "Good Practices and Common Mistakes" to be presented by Dr. Huybert Groenendaal. This was one of the favorite sessions last month at the Palisade Risk Conference in Las Vegas.

Ever question if your Monte Carlo model is correct? Ever wondered how other organizations use @RISK, how to get the most value out of @RISK, and what are some of the most important best practices? Then this is the right free live webcast for you!

An increasing number of organizations are using analytical techniques such as quantitative risk analysis, value at risk (VaR), and risked NPV to help them improve decision making. However, all too often, these techniques may not be used optimally or accurately and their full value may not be realized.

During this presentation, Dr. Huybert Groenendaal will share his hands-on experience through hundreds of projects, and will discuss the following topics:

  1. Good practices for the use of @RISK and risk modeling to support decision-making
  2. Common mistakes in Monte Carlo simulation and how to prevent them.

All good practices and common mistakes will be discussed with the use of real-life risk modeling case studies and models based on EpiX consulting work.

Dr. Huybert Groenendaal is a managing partner at EpiX Analytics, a consultancy that helps clients use Monte Carlo simulation and probabilistic modeling in a broad range of industries and fields, ranging from financial risk analysis, business development, marketing, budgeting, inventory optimization, and pricing, to risk analysis in health. Dr. Groenendaal has extensive experience in risk modeling and analysis for business development, financial valuation, R&D portfolios and portfolio evaluations in pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Dr. Groenendaal also teaches a variety of risk analysis training courses including Financial Risk Modeling for Pharmaceuticals, Quantitative Risk Analysis, and Corporate Finance Risk Analysis and customized on-site courses. He also lectures on the use of risks modeling in business at the executive MBA program at the Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado and teaches two online risk analysis courses at Statistics.com. Dr. Groenendaal has an MBA in Finance from the Wharton School of Business and PhD from Wageningen University and is an adjunct faculty at Colorado State University.

» View the recorded webcast "Good Practices and Common Mistakes"
» View webcast archive

New in DecisionTools Suite 6: Integration with Microsoft Project for project risk modeling

Tuesday, October 30, 2012 by DMUU Training Team

@RISK (risk analysis software using Monte Carlo simulation) is now a truly cross-platform tool, enabling risk modeling of your Microsoft Project schedules using the same @RISK you use for risk analysis modeling in Microsoft Excel!  You can now do your project risk modeling in Excel rather than Microsoft Project, providing a new world of flexibility. A new interface layer reproduces your schedule in Excel, enabling you to use all Excel formulas and @RISK functions. When you make changes to your model in either Project or Excel, those changes are reflected in the other with @RISK’s Sync feature. (Note that all @RISK modeling takes place in Excel, so @RISK functions do not appear in Microsoft Project.) Then simulate your Project schedules in Project itself, using Project's scheduling and calculation engine.

The benefits of using Excel for your Project risk modeling are many.  You can easily build risk registers in Excel for your Project model using new “RiskProject” functions.  You can integrate your cost and schedule analyses. You can standardize on a single tool – @RISK – to meet the needs of your project managers, cost estimators, finance analysts – everyone who deals with risk and decision making under uncertainty in your company. Plus, a single interface means a shorter learning curve for everybody.

@RISK is part of The DecisionTools Suite -- an integrated set of programs for risk analysis and decision making under uncertainty that runs in Microsoft Excel.

» Watch a demonstration of project risk modeling with @RISK
» See What's New in the DecisionTools Suite 6

 

New in DecisionTools Suite 6: Time-series modeling

Monday, October 22, 2012 by DMUU Training Team

@RISK now offers a new set of functions for simulating time series processes, or values that change over time. Any future projection of time series values has inherent uncertainty, and @RISK now lets you account for that uncertainty by looking at the whole range of possible time series projections in your model. This is particularly useful in financial risk analysis modeling and portfolio simulation.

There are functions available for 17 different statistical time series models, including ARMA, GBM, GARCH, and others. These functions are entered as array functions in Microsoft Excel.

@RISK provides new windows for fitting historical time series data to these new functions. The results can be animated to show the behavior of your time series during simulation. All this is integrated into the existing @RISK interface.

@RISK is part of The DecisionTools Suite -- an integrated set of programs for risk analysis and decision making under uncertainty that runs in Microsoft Excel.

» Watch a demonstration of this new feature
» See What's New in the DecisionTools Suite 6

Value Management Strategies: How Risk Analysis is Utilized in Managing Risk on Projects and Programs

Monday, October 22, 2012 by DMUU Training Team

Risk management consultant VMS uses @RISKLike the inner workings of an intricate timepiece, major projects are made up of a number of parts—often moving in different directions—that must all work in concert to keep accurate time. The functioning interconnectivity of the smaller projects is greatly impacted by an organization’s ability to accurately forecast the risk, both major and detailed.  For management consulting firm Value Management Strategies (VMS),  Monte Carlo simulation has proven to be an effective method of risk management for many multi-level projects.

Value Management Strategies, Inc., based in Escondido, Ca. is a management consulting firm specializing in value analysis, value engineering and risk management for organizations in both the public and private sectors. VMS clients include state and federal government agencies, private engineering and architectural firms and local and international manufacturing firms.

Many of VMS’ clients are looking to deliver projects, implement processes or produce innovative products in specific verticals. To successfully complete these projects, they turn to VMS to analyze the seemingly never-ending maze of uncertainty and risk that exists in various projects and to develop risk response strategies and action plans that maximize opportunities and minimize threats. In this capacity, the VMS’ utilization of Monte Carlo simulation through @RISK helps to support the decision-making process, as well as offer a more granular understanding of the nature of uncertainties being characterized. Clarity of the likelihood and exposures of risks can help to minimize delays and maximize efficient deployment of capital resources.

We’re excited that @RISK is able to help VMS to keep its clients “moving parts” moving in the right direction.  Time is money…tick-tock, tick-tock.

» Read more: VMS Utilizes @RISK to Offer Clients a Roadmap to Managing Risk on Projects and Programs

Free Webcast this Thursday: “A Stochastic Simulation Model for Dairy Business Investment Decisions ”

Monday, May 21, 2012 by DMUU Training Team

Join us this Thursday, May 24, 2012, for a free live webcast entitled, "A Stochastic Simulation Model for Dairy Business Investment Decisions " to be presented by Dr. Jeffrey Bewley.

A dynamic, stochastic, mechanistic simulation model of a dairy enterprise was developed to evaluate the cost and benefit streams coinciding with investments in Precision Dairy Farming technologies. The model was constructed to embody the biological and economical complexities of a dairy farm system within a partial budgeting framework. A primary objective was to establish a flexible, user-friendly, farm-specific, decision-making tool for dairy producers or their advisers and technology manufacturers.

The basic deterministic model was created in Microsoft Excel. @RISK was employed to account for the stochastic nature of key variables within a Monte Carlo simulation. Net present value was the primary metric used to assess the economic profitability of investments. The model comprised a series of modules, which synergistically provided the necessary inputs for profitability analysis. Estimates of biological relationships within the model were obtained from the literature in an attempt to represent an average or typical U.S. dairy. Technology benefits were appraised from the resulting impact on disease incidence, disease impact, and reproductive performance. The economic feasibility of investment in an automated BCS system was explored to demonstrate the utility of this model.

An expert opinion survey was conducted to obtain estimates of potential improvements from adoption of this technology. Benefits were estimated through assessment of the impact of BCS on the incidences of ketosis, milk fever, and metritis; conception rate at first service; and energy efficiency. Improvements in reproductive performance had the greatest influence on revenues followed by energy efficiency and disease reduction, in order. Stochastic variables that had the most influence on NPV were: variable cost increases after technology adoption; the odds ratios for ketosis and milk fever incidence and conception rates at first service associated with varying BCS ranges; uncertainty of the impact of ketosis, milk fever, and metritis on days open, unrealized milk, veterinary costs, labor, and discarded milk; and the change in the percentage of cows with BCS at calving ≤ 3.25 before and after technology adoption. The deterministic inputs impacting NPV were herd size, management level, and level of milk production. Investment in this technology may be profitable; but results were very herd-specific.

Investment decisions for Precision Dairy Farming technologies can be analyzed with input of herd-specific values using this model. This free live webcast will go into detail about the model, as well.

Dr. Jeffrey Bewley, is Assistant Professor and Extension Dairy Specialist, specializing in Dairy Systems Management, Dairy Decision Making, and Precision Dairy Farming, at the University of Kentucky. He received his BS from the University of Kentucky, MS from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and PhD from Purdue University. Jeffrey has a keen appreciation for the opportunities automation provides for more precise management. His own work is in the technical and economic assessment of Precision Dairy Farming technologies, body condition scoring, and temperature monitoring. His outreach program is focused on developing tools and strategies for improved decision-making on dairy farms.

» Register now (FREE)
» View archived webcasts

Free Webcast this Thursday: “Refining the Business Case for Sustainable Energy Projects Using @RISK and PrecisionTree: A Biofuel Plant Case Study”

Monday, January 9, 2012 by DMUU Training Team
Join us this Thursday, Janurary 12, 2012, for a free live webcast entitled, "Refining the Business Case for Sustainable Energy Projects Using @RISK and PrecisionTree: A Biofuel Plant Case Study" to be presented by Scott Mongeau.

The sustainable energy industry sits at the nexus of growth and change: the popular groundswell for ‘green initiatives’, ongoing debates concerning global warming / climate change, fickle government incentives, the quest for renewable and alternative sources, expansion in developing economies, and the rapid emergence of new technologies. Sustainable energy industry sectors such as biofuel, solar, wind power each have unique selling points as well as practical challenges.  Across the board, profit margins are uncertain and tight, demanding detailed analysis and complex business cases.  Palisade's DecisionTools Suite is an ideal vehicle for conducting the deep risk analysis needed to separate the hype and ‘wishful vibes’ from the real risks and tangible profit cases needed to ‘green light’ sustainability projects.

Sustainable energy’s central competitor and sometimes partner, the petroleum majors, have distinct advantages, having established, streamlined supply chains and being embedded into the global economy.  However, traditional petroleum exploration is going to increasingly extreme and risky lengths to locate and exploit new reserves (i.e. Athabasca Oil Sands, deep sea drilling, project development in politically unstable regions).  The petroleum majors are dedicated users of the Palisade DecisionTools Suite to make their increasingly complex and risky business cases.

This free live webcast asserts that an energy development ‘risk / reward parity’ level is growing between new petroleum exploration and production and sustainable energy initiatives.  The presentation uses a biofuel plant case study as an example of how a profitable business case can be made for a sustainable energy project using techniques commonly applied in petroleum exploration and engineering initiatives.  The biofuel industry is expected to multiply its production by a factor of 50 by 2020.  The uncertainties of government subsidy, tax credits, and loan guarantees are crucial to meeting biofuel profit margins. Stochastic statistical analysis greatly improves the ability to pinpoint risk and to identify mitigation strategies. The case study uses @RISK to model biofuel project NPV, Evolver to suggest plant optimization strategies, and PrecisionTree to guide strategic decision making. The approaches presented have promise as a due-diligence tool for prospective sustainability entrepreneurs, investors, project managers, and firms. 

Scott Mongeau is Lead Consultant and Founder of Biomatica BV (biomatica.com), a niche consultancy specializing in biotechnology industry risk management. Scott has over a decade of experience in biotech, including key positions at Genentech Inc. related to risk management. He currently consults for several biofuel start-up initiatives and completed his thesis on biofuel project risk management. In addition to consulting, Scott is a part-time PhD researcher in the Executive Doctorate Program at Nyenrode Business University in the Netherlands. He holds a Global Executive MBA (OneMBA) and Masters in Financial Management (MFM) from the Erasmus Rotterdam School of Management (RSM). Additionally, he holds a Certificate in Finance from University of California at Berkeley, a Masters in Communication from the University of Texas at Austin, and a Graduate Degree in Applied Information Systems Management from the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology as a Rotary Ambassadorial Scholar. Having lived and worked in a number of countries, Scott is an American citizen and currently consults and conducts research from his office in Leiden, Netherlands.

» Register now (FREE)
» View archived webcasts

@RISK Tip: Format Cells with @RISK Inputs and Outputs

Wednesday, September 14, 2011 by DMUU Training Team
You can easily flag any cell that contains @RISK input distribution functions or @RISK output functions using the Application Settings window of @RISK. Application Settings is located under the Utilities menu in the @RISK ribbon:

Format Cells with @RISK Inputs and Outputs
 
Here you can apply default cell formats to cells in your workbook where @RISK inputs and outputs are located. You can select a color for cell font, border or background.

Here you can apply default cell formats to cells in your workbook where @RISK inputs and outputs are located.
 
Using the Application Settings Dialog, a wide variety of @RISK settings can be set at default values that will be used each time the program runs. These include graph color, displayed statistics, coloring of @RISK cells in Excel, and others.

@RISK is an add-in to Microsoft Excel. @RISK performs risk analysis using Monte Carlo simulation to show you many possible outcomes in your Microsoft Excel spreadsheet—and tells you how likely they are to occur. This means you can judge which risks to take and which ones to avoid, allowing for the best decision making under uncertainty.

» Read more about Application Settings in @RISK

With Earthquake Aftershocks, the Risk is Great – But May Be Easier to Predict

Wednesday, August 24, 2011 by DMUU Training Team
5.8 magnitude earthquake, Mineral, VAToday a moderately powerful earthquake rattled Washington, D.C. and was felt as far north as Massachusetts. Sitting here, feeling the earthquake shake my desk and water glass in central New York State, hundreds of miles from the epicenter, I was reminded that we are never far from the risk of natural disaster.

The Washington Post’s Jason Samenow wrote today that aftershocks are a significant concern. Although the 5.9 magnitude quake did not appear to cause significant damage, earthquakes are rare in the region and people are ill-prepared for them. According to the Post: “McNutt, director of USGS expressed a concern that the earlier quake will precede something more powerful: ‘What the concern is, of course, is that this is a foreshock. If it’s a foreshock, then the worse is yet to come.’ If not a foreshock, Mike Blanpied, associate coordinator for the USGS earthquakes hazards program cautioned aftershocks are possible: ‘Aftershocks could go on for days, weeks, or even months. They’re most likely to be felt under the next three or four days.’”

It got me thinking to ways that risk and data analysis techniques that we use every day in business applications could be applied in this situation. After all, the use of Monte Carlo simulation and and decision trees in DecisionTools Suite software has been used to cope with natural disasters – from volcanoes to hurricanes.

A few years ago the US Geological Survey asked the same question in an interesting study on the use of Monte Carlo simulation for the prediction of aftershocks in California. The paper, published in 2008, notes the typical absence of data specific to a particular earthquake site and examines the usefulness of Monte Carlo simulation for “assessing recurrence from limited paleoearthquake records.” In the absence of data, Monte Carlo simulation can be quite effective.

In a similar situation, the use of neural networks was examined by researchers in China to get a handle on the risk of aftershocks from the enormous 2009 Sichuan province quake. In their paper, published by the Journal of Sustainable Energy and the Environment in 2009, data from initial aftershocks was provided to a neural network so that it could “learn” any patterns in the aftershocks. These patterns were then used to predict future tremors. The concentration and trend of the aftershocks was predicted “precisely,” according to researchers.

In science as well as business, quantitative risk and decision analysis techniques produce tangible benefits that directly impact many of us.

Randy Heffernan
VP, Palisade Corporation

Neural Networks Optimize Police Force Efficiency

Wednesday, August 24, 2011 by DMUU Training Team
In the August 16, 2011 edition of the New York Times there was an interesting article about the use of predictive analytics by police departments. Entitled “Sending the Police Before There’s a Crime,” the article explores how the Santa Cruz, California police department optimizes the use of limited resources by anticipating where crimes are more likely to occur so they can deploy police there in advance. How does it do this? According to the article:

“Santa Cruz’s method is more sophisticated than most. Based on models for predicting aftershocks from earthquakes, it generates projections about which areas and windows of time are at highest risk for future crimes by analyzing and detecting patterns in years of past crime data. The projections are recalibrated daily, as new crimes occur and updated data is fed into the program.”

This may sound like science fiction technology, but the model Santa Cruz is using is exactly what neural networks do.  Neural networks are an artificial intelligence data analysis technique that identifies patterns from historical data and uses those patterns to predict new outcomes when presented with current partial data.  

Neural Networks Optimize Police Force EfficiencyIt’s the same technology that shuts off your credit card when it’s stolen and someone uses it to buy ten 60-inch TVs in another country.  In that case, the credit card company has established spending patterns from your purchasing history, and when a transaction appears that falls outside that pattern, a neural network assesses the probability of fraud. If the probability is high enough, the card is blocked.

The applications for neural networks are limitless. They have been used for medical diagnosis, commodities price prediction, patient load forecasting in hospital, and much, much more. You can read examples of examples of interesting neural network applications using NeuralTools, a leading neural networks tool for Excel, here.

Santa Cruz’s efforts are being monitored and copied by other major metropolitan forces such as the Chicago and Los Angeles police departments. Such analytics could prove to be a major tool in the resource-strapped battle against crime for years to come.

» NBC Nightly News video: "New police motto: To predict and serve?"

Free Webcast this Thursday: “Use of Simulation Models in Pricing Health Insurance and Reinsurance Risk”

Monday, August 22, 2011 by DMUU Training Team
Join us on Thursday, August 25, 2011, for a free live webcast delivered by Tim Robinson and David Wilson, entitled "Use of Simulation Models in Pricing Health Insurance and Reinsurance Risk."

While healthcare claim costs are fairly predictable for large populations, existing pricing models often prove inadequate for that portion of the risk that is the most variable: large or “excess loss” claims typically covered by employer stop loss and other forms of reinsurance for high-cost claims. Even when rating and underwriting applications are able to accurately forecast expected claim costs, they are typically not structured to measure the variability in such claim costs from year to year. This is problematic when conducting detailed enterprise risk assessment studies or estimating capital and surplus requirements for health insurance programs. This webcast will illustrate some applications of @RISK risk modeling software to solving these problems. Examples will include Monte Carlo simulation models designed to quantify capital and surplus requirements for a health reinsurance captive; simulation models designed to price aggregate employer stop loss insurance; and simulation models designed to price aggregating specific or “inner aggregate” corridors in employer stop loss insurance.


Tim Robinson has over 20 years of experience as a healthcare actuary. He has a broad range of actuarial, underwriting and management experience working with diverse organizations including reinsurers, insurance companies, disease management firms, health plans and employer groups.  Tim has worked most recently on developing innovative healthcare rating and underwriting models; strategic and analytic support for a variety of start-up health insurance programs; and underwriting applications of predictive modeling and large claims analysis.  He also has extensive experience with product development, pricing, underwriting and valuation work for insurers and plan sponsors.  Tim is a Partner with Windsor Strategy Partners, LLC.  He works with clients in the healthcare industry, directing actuarial and strategic analysis in support of their risk management goals and initiatives.

David Wilson is the founder and President of Windsor Strategy Partners. Windsor Strategy Partners is a specialized healthcare strategy firm helping clients develop and implement strategic growth and risk management initiatives. WSP’s clients include leading reinsurers, insurers, captive insurers, provider organizations, technology companies, employee benefit consulting firms, reinsurance intermediaries and investment groups. David leads the firm’s marketing and research effort and acting as a senior advisor to our clients and partners. David has been active in the health insurance arena for over 30 years. He is recognized as a leading expert in healthcare insurance and reinsurance pricing and underwriting. He is a strategic advisor to start-up and established companies in the health insurance field.

» Register now (FREE)
» View archived webcasts

The Summit Looms!

Wednesday, January 5, 2011 by Steve Hunt

IQPC
There's an important event coming up in just a few short weeks--"Profit through Process," the IQPC Lean Six Sigma summit.  The summit is an almost week-long conference in Orlando, January 17 through January 20. IQPC has rounded up about 800 experts to deliver their knowledge, insights, and often inspiration to the folks who attend.   These presenters represent some high-profile companies like BP and PayPal, as well as leading consulting firms.

The sessions have been organized to satisfy the hankerings of everybody in the Six Sigma-process optimization crowd, from the chief quality officer to the Black Belt. And one thing I think will be really productive for the folks who get down to Orlando is the conference's emphasis on integrating a Lean Six Sigma program so that it becomes a living part of the organization.

Eight hundred is a lot of experts, who should have a lot of useful ideas about driving profit through process improvement.  And will be a lot of useful tools to check out.  Which brings me to my role at the summit--how can I sign off on thes blog without putting in a plug for Palisade?  I'll be there with our Monte Carlo software--booth #7--extolling the virtues of Monte Carlo simulation for Lean Six Sigma.  Monte Carlo simulation is a relatively recent addition to the Six Sigma toolkit, and while you may not think risk analysis is central to process optimization, it is really about getting a grip on uncertainty--and you can certainly relate to that.

Please know the IQPC is offering a "Free Hall Pass" for those interested in networking or exploring the latest Lean, Six Sigma & BPM solutions.

Remember, it's January, and you can come to Florida!  Here's the website--www.leansixsigmasummit.com/Event.aspx?id=341814.

I hope to see you there!

Free Webcast This Thursday: The Use of the DecisionTools Suite in Biotechnology Project and Portfolio Decision Making

Monday, August 30, 2010 by DMUU Training Team
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a global biotechnology company based out of Cambridge, MA. The Company's strategy is to commercialize its products both independently and in collaboration with major pharmaceutical companies. Vertex's product pipeline is focused on viral diseases, cystic fibrosis, inflammation, autoimmune diseases, cancer, and pain.

Given the uncertainty of outcomes in the biotech industry, consideration of variability is an inherent part of the decision process. Often, the mean (average) is not a relevant decision criteria. This is especially true for smaller biotech companies like Vertex – the opportunity costs are extremely high because scarce capital resources would be invested elsewhere, with a higher probability of realistic return. For example, a company may reject a project which is profitable on average (positive Net Present Value) because some of the possible outcomes are unacceptable to the decision maker. Consideration of variability allows a decision maker to bring in their own risk tolerance into the decision. A similar argument applies when estimating a safety margin above a base case (e.g. in cost budgeting).

Vertex’s strategy and analytics group within the corporate finance division seeks to provide the senior management with dynamic revenue and profit forecasting methodology that helps to identify types of drugs that should be developed given a finite amount of cash and resources. A traditional financial view allows the user to identify scenarios and potential outcomes, but lacks the ability to show the range of potential values within each and every outcome. Vertex’s team uses the DecisonTools Suite to establish the average outcome, the variability of outcomes and to pressure-test risk and uncertainty of a particular scenario throughout the decision process.

Vertex’s team built a complex financial risk analysis model using @RISK to enhance its portfolio process. Monte Carlo simulation and optimization are used to analyze and optimize project and portfolio decisions, given short and long-term corporate strategy. @RISK is also frequently used throughout the business development process: simulating across multiple sales forecasts provides BD team with a range of potential outcomes, making it easy to pinpoint a particular scenario on a curve, along with its probability and value. TopRank turns the sensitivity analysis into a quick and seamless exercise, answering multiple what-if questions within minutes. Franchise and program leaders can now see a dollar effect of their program being delayed or advanced, adding supplementary indications to the development plan and even addressing the price uncertainties all at the same time. The simple interface of PrecisionTree along with tornado chart outputs makes it easy to explain the effect and importance of a particular assumption / decision to an audience with no finance background.

As the company continues to grow, adding more drugs and collaborations to its development pipeline, we will see in this free live webcast how the DecisionsTools Suite remains one of Vertex’s analytical tools of choice to enhance and guide the decision making process.

» Register now (FREE)
» View archived webcasts

@RISK Six Sigma calculator models the performance of a process with uncertain elements

Thursday, June 17, 2010 by Steve Hunt
Developed using the Six Sigma features of @RISK,
software for risk analysis using Monte Carlo simulation


Palisade’s Six Sigma Calculator allows you to create a function that models the performance of a process with uncertain elements. It allows you to include uncertainty around design factors through the use of probability distributions. It was built by Palisade Custom Development using the @RISK Developer’s Kit (RDK) to perform a Monte Carlo simulation so the following process capability metrics can be calculated: Cpk, Cpk Upper, Cpk Lower, Sigma Level, DPM, Cp, Ppk, Pp.

The RDK is Palisade’s widely-used risk analysis programming toolkit. It uses the features and functions of @RISK for Excel - the industry-leading risk analysis tool for spreadsheets. The RDK allows you to build Monte Carlo simulation models in your own applications using Windows and .NET programming languages, such as C, C#, C++, Visual Basic, or Visual Basic .NET. Examples of programs written in Windows and .NET programming languages are provided.

Palisade Custom Development services are used to build tailored applications for individual client needs using @RISK and other technology.

» Six Sigma Calculator
» More about using @RISK for Six Sigma
» More about using @RISK
» Palisade Custom Development

Robust Risk Analysis for the Time/Expertise Poor – Part 1

Tuesday, April 13, 2010 by DMUU Training Team
I have recently spoken to several clients whom have all came to the same conclusion about the risk analysis solution they think is most appropriate. They don’t want to do it, and I have no problem with that!

Of course that’s not precisely true. The benefits of Monte Carlo techniques in risk analysis are quite well understood and there is plenty of buy-in from businesses in the Australasian region. The trouble these businesses face (particularly in the realm of project cost estimation) is that the specific process of quantifying their risks for stochastic analysis and the ensuing simulation is not well understood and the means to ameliorate this appears to be beyond their reach. The modelling and simulation components of the project risk management process are not given adequate resources to be performed well, and certainly not to the extent that they provide the most useful information.

It is the case that many companies do not employ dedicated quantitative analysts. This means they have to rely upon some (maybe one) person in the team who has a non-zero quantity of experience and possibly training with risk simulation software to create a valid and credible stochastic model. This person is also not likely to be given enough time to do said task, thus the model inevitably suffers. It is my experience that most models – and all project cost estimation models – can be improved or actually need to be fixed.

So the corporate mind is willing, but the flesh is weak. How can this be addressed? No amount of additional training will suddenly allow you to overcome your time and resource constraints. Perhaps you can’t get the budget for training anyway or don’t want to master risk analysis software when it’s not really core to your role? The solution is one that I personally endorse (and provide!) as a risk analysis consultant – custom Excel programming.

VBA for Excel is a fairly simple language to learn, yet very powerful tool for automating repetitive or sometimes complex spreadsheet tasks. A customised solution involves writing VBA code to perform the tasks we’d rather not do ourselves in the risk analysis model. The “we” here refers to companies that find themselves in the situations previously described whereby they are incapable of creating and operating these models, not necessarily though any fault of their own. In my next blog I’ll examine some modelling problems/requirements and how they might be dealt with effectively using customisation.

Rishi Prabhakar
Trainer/Consultant

Profitability Projections in a Manufacturing Environment of High Uncertainty

Monday, April 12, 2010 by Steve Hunt

The other night, I had the opportunity to watch a free webcast titled “Use of @RISK for Probabilistic Decision Analysis of a Manufacturing Forecast in an Environment of High Uncertainty”. This presentation was extremely timely, since many companies are struggling to survive in these challenging economic times. Dr. Jose Briones did an excellent job discussing and illustrating how profitability projections in a manufacturing environment are directly tied to how the sales forecast fits with the capability of the operation, and how different manufacturing capacities and productions rates impact the output of the plant and the allocation of the fixed cost of production.

In the example he presents, a company is trying to decide how best to balance the sales of certain families of products to maximize revenue, maintain a diverse product line, and properly price each individual product based on the impact to the manufacturing schedule and fixed cost allocation.

He spends an appropriate amount of time discussing different input distributions such as the Triangular, Normal, Pert and Gamma distributions as well as sharing his recommendations on when to use them. He also shares his expertise on fixed cost allocation by product and the dangers in using the common method of dividing the fixed cost by the total production, and recommends doing so by allocating the fixed costs based on the projected run time of each product family. Lastly, he spends some time discussing the interpretation of the results, which I feel does a great job wrapping up the information presented in the webcast.
 

Dr. Jose A. Briones is currently the Director of Operations for SpyroTek Performance Solutions, a diversified supplier of specialty materials, BPM software and innovation consulting services. Dr. Briones has a PhD in Chemical Engineering from Clemson University and is a graduate of the Business Administration Program of Wharton Business School. If you have any questions about the webcast, you can contact Jose at Brioneja@SpyroTek.com or through Jameson Romeo-Hall at Palisade Corporation.
 

 

Neural Nets vs. the Ripple Effect

Thursday, April 1, 2010 by Holly Bailey
About a week ago the Financial Times ran an article about a "new" investment analysis technique that could cut through turbulence in the financial markets: neural network analysis.  I thought okay, this isn't new but maybe the application is innovative.  Besides, I liked the metaphor the reporter used, a metal ball dropped in a vat of oil and the ensuing ripples that disturb the oil.
 
The article is about software developed by a Danish investment firm that turned its back on "linear" models to adopt a neural network approach that continually reclassifies investments in a portfolio and then makes suggestions about which equities to buy and which to sell. The proprietary software chews through a heap of data--prices, price-earnings ratio, and interest rates, for starters, and its performance bench mark is the Russell 1000 index. 
 
The test portfolio used to proof the method was acquired in 2007, just before the ball dropped into the oil.  For a time it seemed to hold up but then got caught in the turbulence and its undertow. It has now recovered nicely, ahead of the Russell 1000 in fact, and the asset managers are looking  for more investors. This is a sweet success story, especially given the demon turbulence looming over the project and the fact that the assets are apparently owned by the Danish state pension plan.

I understood the use of neural network software to counter nonlinear events like market turbulence, and I understood the continual classification and reclassification.  But I was intrigued that nowhere in the article was there a mention of risk, risk analysis, or even risk assessment.  Maybe it was there all the time, incorporated in the proprietary software, and maybe it just wasn't mentioned.  Certainly the asset managers who developed the program were aware they were at risk--they were chewing their nails as their fund slid down right beside all the other funds that were dropping in value.  But assessing risk doesn't seem to have been a factor in the firm's new defense against mayhem in the markets.  
 
So.  Is it time to shut down your Monte Carlo software?  I don't think so. . . .